Business Joomla Themes by Justhost Reviews


IJETS is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. publication malpractice is strictly prohibited. Conformance to standards of ethical behaviour is therefore expected of all parties involved. Our mission is to guarantee publishing original work which is valuable to the intellectual community in the best possible form. Conformance to standards of ethical behaviour is therefore expected of all parties involved according to their responsibilities.

1. The Authors should

  • Submit papers only on work that has been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and that complies with all relevant legislation.

  • Present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation.

  • Endeavor to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.

  • Adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarized, and has not been published elsewhere;

  • Must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

  • Ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others this must be appropriately cited.

  • Take collective responsibility for submitted and published work;

  • Ensure the paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Duplicitous or expressively inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

  • Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

  • Ensure that the authorship accurately reflects individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting; and where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged.

  • Disclose relevant funding sources and any existing or potential conflicts of interest. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

  • Promptly notify the journal editors and the editor to retract or correct the paper, if discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work.

2. The Editors should

  • Be responsible for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts.

  • Ensure fair and suitable peer review process.

  • Evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

  • Disclose any information about any submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher.

  • Guard the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct.

3. The Editorial board should

  • Keep information pertaining to submitted manuscripts confidential.

  • Disclose any conflicts of interest.

  • Evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content.

  • Responsible for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts.

4. The Reviewer board should

  • Keep confidential and treat as privileged information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors.

  • Conduct review objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  • Identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that had been previously reported elsewhere should be accompanied by the relevant citation;

  • Request to the Editors attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  • Communicate with the editors, In case, He/She feel that it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time so that the editors could sent to any other reviewer.

  • Not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers..

Hits: 2619